|
File
or Folder Name
/ Type |
Brief
Description |
|
..up
one level |
|
|
Appeal.htm |
The Oregon Supreme
Court in November 1999 hears oral arguments in Smothers vs. Gresham Transfer,
Inc. |
|
Exclusive_Remedy_in_Ohio.htm |
In 1984, the Ohio
Supreme Court, in three related precedent-setting decisions, took a hammer
and chisel to the exclusive-remedy foundation holding up the state's comp
system. |
|
Fate.htm |
Written in November
1999, it describes what the stakes are in Smothers vs. Gresham Transfer,
Inc. |
|
Fire_Injured_Workers.htm |
The Texas Supreme
Court rules that employers can avoid the requirements of workers comp altogether
by declining the insurance and firing workers who file claims. |
|
Florida_Worker_Can_Sue.htm |
The Florida Supreme
Court rules in March 2000 that an employer can be sued in tort for a worker's
injury -- despite workers' comp -- if it should have known that an injury
was "substantially certain" to occur, even if it didn't have actual knowledge. |
|
HMO_Reimbursement.htm |
Marylands highest
court rules that even though an HMO's policy said it can be reimbursed from
a member's tort recovery, it is unenforceable. |
|
Penn_Supreme_Court_Ruling.htm |
The U.S. Supreme Court
holds in March 1999 that insurers can't be sued for withholding benefit
payments as they decide whether treatment is reasonable and neccessary.
[Link 2] [Link
3] |
|
State
Farm Bad Faith.htm |
The Arizona Supreme
Court rules that State Farm can be sued for bad faith. It involved an auto
accident. |
|
Texas_Lawsuits_and_Costs.htm |
Texas judge determines
that employers who dont provide workers comp coverage can still
require employees to waive their right to sue over on-the-job injuries. |
|
Work_Comp_Shake-Up.htm |
The Labor Research
Association writes in 1999 about the Oregon Supreme Court agreeing to hear
whether Terry Smothers has the right to sue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..up
one level |
|