Thanks, but no thanks.

This forum can be viewed but not be posted to. Visit our new one here.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Injuredworker Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by john Lewis on March 12, 1999 at 18:01:47:

In Reply to: Re: What is great about 220? posted by Tom Mattis on March 12, 1999 at 12:39:32:

At the risk of being edited by the webmaster, let me ask you, Tom Mattis, is Oregon a leader or a follower? If 49 states were jumping off a bridge, would Oregon? Anyway, I thought Oregon had taken the lead in revising, revamping and 'recking workers' comp.
If you free up your time by dumping the remaining 25% of the cases you close, how would you use that newly crated time and money? To conduct a reality based survey of the system? To hire more qualified medical staff to review closures?
Why should we injured workers get behind any legislation that doesn't remedy the three s's: starve out, sell off and shoddy medical care?
Again, no offense, but this fine tuning seems whimsical.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Injuredworker Message Board ] [ FAQ ]