Re: Thanks, but no thanks.

This forum can be viewed but not be posted to. Visit our new one here.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Injuredworker Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by c. hubberd on March 15, 1999 at 05:32:34:

In Reply to: Re: Thanks, but no thanks. posted by Tom Mattis on March 12, 1999 at 18:51:32:

Mr. Mattis, your failure to address the issues raised in this BB, and your willingness to resort to name-calling are further indicators that SB220 is unjustifiable, unnecessary, and unresponsive.

We here in Washington have heard more than our share of horror stories from Injured Workers from Oregon who have been poorly treated by the WC system in Oregon.

When will I finally read that people like you are willing to stand WITH the injured workers you so care about, rather than standing in opposition to them? The question begs your response-- what do you think an injured worker deserves, regardless of the insurance politics?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Injuredworker Message Board ] [ FAQ ]