|Author||Subject: Banks, health insurers spend millions|
|Advocate|| Posted At 08:25:53 12/28/99
Banks, health insurers spend millions as bills reach Congress
Saturday, December 25, 1999
By JONATHAN D. SALANT
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
WASHINGTON -- The financial industry spent $100 million this year in its successful effort to get Congress to knock down Depression-era barriers and let banks, securities firms and insurance companies merge and sell each other's products.
The price of persuasion for a coalition of health, insurance and business groups opposing new regulations on managed care health plans: $30 million during the first six months of 1999.
Health care and banking were two top issues of the just-concluded congressional session, and the industries most affected by the legislation spent millions of dollars during the year in lobbying expenses and campaign contributions.
"Those who plow in lots of money have a weighted advantage our Founding Fathers never intended," said Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., the lead House GOP sponsor of legislation to overhaul campaign finance rules.
Trying to pass legislation to remove Depression-era barriers that barred banks, insurance companies and investment firms from merging or competing against each other, the financial industry spent $187,000 per lawmaker this year on lobbying expenses and campaign contributions. That's according to Public Disclosure, an Internet consulting firm, and the Campaign Study Group, a group of former journalists who conduct research for media organizations.
An Associated Press computer analysis of data from the Campaign Study Group found that supporters of the banking legislation received far more in contributions from financial interests than did opponents.
Complete figures were available for lobbying and campaign contributions through the first six months of the year, while several political action committees -- but not all -- also have reported campaign contributions for the third quarter.
Senators who supported the final bill averaged at least $38,000 in campaign contributions from the financial industry between Jan. 1 and Sept. 30, compared with an average of $6,000 for those who opposed the bill. In the House, supporters averaged at least $17,900 from financial interests, while opponents averaged $6,700.
"Not since the telecom act of 1996 has so much money been spent by so few to the detriment of so many," said one bill opponent, Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y. "The bill itself is a billboard for campaign finance reform."
Not so, argued one of the measure's main proponents, House Banking Committee Chairman James Leach, R-Iowa, who noted that he doesn't accept political action committee contributions.
"This bill has the strongest public protection elements of any piece of legislation in modern times in finance," Leach said. "Of all the approaches to financial modernization, this is the most pro-public. And there is a paucity of special-interest provisions."
Despite all the money spent, the American public didn't weigh into the fight over overhauling the financial industry, said Sheila Krumholz, research director for the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan research group that studies campaign finance. Rather, the entire battle was fought between industry lobbyists and members of Congress, she said.
"It's a classic," Krumholz said. "Not only are people not paying attention, but the lobbyists are such heavy hitters. There is such enormous and wealthy interests that the politicians are eager to collect campaign re-election funds from."
Efforts to regulate managed health care organizations, on the other hand, did attract the public's interest. Polls show health care is consistently among the top two or three issues of concern to potential voters.
Still, the health care industry won when Congress didn't pass a bill. Members of the Health Benefits Coalition -- which represents health care, insurance and business organizations -- spent $28.5 million to lobby and gave $1.5 million to federal candidates between Jan. 1 and June 30. That comes out to $56,000 per lawmaker.
The Senate legislation, criticized by consumer groups and Democrats as supporting the health industry and failing to protect patients, passed 53-47, largely along party lines. Supporters of the bill received an average of at least $27,000 from the health care industry -- including members of the Health Benefits Coalition -- through Sept. 30, while opponents averaged $2,300, the AP computer analysis showed.
Likewise, while the House eventually passed bipartisan legislation that would give patients the right to sue their health maintenance organizations, lawmakers first rejected three substitutes that would have weakened the bill's consumer protections. In all three cases, lawmakers who backed the rejected versions averaged higher contributions from the health industry than those who voted against them.
Rep. Bill Thomas, R-Calif., chairman of the House Ways and Means health subcommittee, questioned the correlation between contributions and votes.
"Just because somebody votes a certain way doesn't mean they're bought," Thomas said. "They could see the world the same way."
© 1999 The Associated Press.
All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed.
Web shopping easy for most, but some had trouble
Telecom revolution transforming our lives
Italian publisher to buy store chain
E-tailer stocks plunge as cost concerns spread
Steel prices rise as slump eases
Apple growers keep a wary eye on China
Retailers locally, nationally register sales increase
Lockheed in line for Pentagon order
Lamonts seeks lenders' support
William Boeing: Seattle's first high flyer